Oldtimers defend UPA govt against Rahul loyalists | India News

Oldtimers defend UPA govt in opposition to Rahul loyalists | India Information

NEW DELHI: With a Rahul Gandhi loyalist holding UPA chargeable for the weakening of the celebration, Congress functionaries on Saturday got here out in defence of the 2004-2014 authorities calling it “transformative” and one which had been sabotaged by a conspiracy and malicious marketing campaign by political rivals.
The backlash got here after an issue erupted on Thursday when, in a gathering of Rajya Sabha members chaired by Sonia Gandhi, new MP Rajeev Satav countered a requirement by Congress veterans for “introspection” into the 2019 defeat by blaming the UPA period for the celebration’s unpopularity.
Congress MP Manish Tewari referred to as for a settlement of the management problem and informed TOI, “A regular president provides stability at the top. Given the prevailing situation when the credibility of the government is at its nadir, it will help the opposition coalesce around Congress.”
Senior member Anand Sharma posted an 11-tweet thread to defend UPA. “Congressmen must be proud of UPA’s legacy. No party disowns or discredits its legacy. Nobody expects BJP to be charitable and give us credit but our own should respect and not forget,” he wrote.
Tewari stated: “Despite being in wilderness for ten years, BJP never ran down the Vajpayee years in power. In fact, BJP passionately defended it at every forum. It is unfortunate that some ill-informed people would rather fight the ghost of UPA than frontally take on BJP.”
Diplomat-turned-politician Shashi Tharoor stated classes needed to be discovered from election defeats “but not by playing into the hands of our ideological enemies”. Former Union minister Milind Deora lamented that Singh’s service was criticised in his presence.
Because the storm grew, Satav clarified that he had by no means questioned Singh’s management, and blamed the row on media reviews.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *