Attorney General okays contempt action against stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra

Legal professional Basic okays contempt motion towards slapstick comedian Kunal Kamra


Venugopal says tweet tends to decrease authority of Supreme Courtroom and undermines public confidence in it

 

Legal professional Basic Ok.Ok. Venugopal on Friday consented to contempt motion towards slapstick comedian Kunal Kamra for his “grossly vulgar and obnoxious” tweet with {a photograph} of two fingers meant to “deliberately insult” the Chief Justice of India.

Mr. Venugopal mentioned the tweet tended to decrease the authority of the Supreme Courtroom and undermined public confidence in it.

The tweet was uploaded on November 18.

‘Depiction of the two fingers’

“The depiction of the two fingers, with the legend that he means the middle one, is to deliberately insult the Chief Justice of India, which would equally be an insult to the Supreme Court of India, which the Chief Justice heads”, Mr. Venugopal reasoned.

The consent letter beneath the Contempt of Courtroom Act of 19750 was in reply to a grievance made by advocate Anuj Singh, a lawyer from Uttar Pradesh.

Additionally learn: Parliamentary panel grills Twitter over Kunal Kamra’s tweets focusing on Supreme Courtroom, Chief Justice of India

“The tweet is grossly vulgar and obnoxious, and I have no doubt that it would tend to lower the authority of the Supreme Court as well as undermine the confidence that the litigant public have in the institution of the Supreme Court itself”, the highest regulation officer and constitutional authority wrote.

That is the second consent given by Mr. Venugopal for contempt motion towards Mr. Kamra in November.

The sooner consent was relating to Mr. Kamra’s tweets on the choice of the Supreme Courtroom to grant interim bail to Republic TV editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami.

Refuses to apologise

Mr. Kamra had refused to apologise or retract the tweets. As an alternative, he tweeted that he wished to “volunteer” the time that could be allotted for listening to his contempt case to others “who have not been as lucky and privileged as I am to jump the queue”.

“May I suggest the demonetisation petition, the petition challenging the revocation of J&K’s special status, the matter of the legality of electoral bonds or countless other matters that are more deserving of time and attention,” he wrote in an announcement

Mr. Venugopal had discovered Mr. Kamra’s tweets, particularly one which confirmed the Supreme Courtroom constructing morphed in saffron color with a BJP flag atop as a substitute of the Tricolour, “highly objectionable”.

The regulation officer had mentioned they “clearly crossed the line between humour and contempt of court”.

“I find that today people believe that they can boldly and brazenly condemn the Supreme Court of India and its judges by exercising what they believe is their freedom of speech. But under the Constitution, the freedom of speech is subject to the law of contempt… I believe it is time people understand that attacking the Supreme Court unjustifiedly and brazenly will attract punishment under the Contempt of Court Act”, he noticed.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *